Home > Leadership > Best Practices > Is “Servant Leadership” Too Soft for Today’s Workforce?

Is “Servant Leadership” Too Soft for Today’s Workforce?

By: Dave Berkus

 

Is Servant Leadership Too Soft

It’s a term rooted in ancient philosophy. Robert Greenleaf may have been the first to resurrect the concept in his book published in 1970. Not quite as bold as inverting the management triangle, the concept of servant leadership requires that a business manager focus upon his or her people’s highest priority needs first.

The question begged by the headline above is whether this form of leadership is perceived as soft, indecisive, and inappropriate for the fast-moving world of today’s business.

A servant leader uses a participative style of management, as opposed to one that is autocratic or (at the opposite end of the spectrum) laissez-faire. More important, a servant leader involves employees in the process of decision-making, focusing upon the performance and satisfaction of employees.

Doesn’t sound tough or forceful enough for you? You are not alone. It is a very thin line between abdication of responsibility and participative leadership. The world loves bold leadership. Steve Jobs, who was known to be in charge of each detail in design. Elon Musk, who obsesses with metrics and constantly asks for employees to feed him their concerns but makes bold moves on his own.

In technology-based enterprises, the question of leadership vision becomes mixed with leadership style. Can a visionary leader abdicate the execution of that vision by subordinating to those who carry out the execution of that vision? Or must he or she be more like Jobs or Musk and stand in the center of the storm, constantly testing the execution efforts of those around?

There is a place for a leader as servant. But the perception of that leader being soft and lacking in strong leadership traits is the sure result of using this method as the leading style for a CEO. It is fine as a secondary style used in tactical decision-making, when strategic issues are not the focus, and where threats to corporate health or resources are not evident.

But those leaders who will be remembered as having changed the world, even if the world is defined as within the walls of one enterprise, are those who were clear in their ability to communicate urgency, quality and focus upon the customer—not necessarily those who delegated the best or allowed decisions to flow from management concurrence.

Published: August 22, 2016
949 Views

Source: Berkonomics

Trending Articles

Stay up to date with
a person

Dave Berkus

Dave Berkus is a noted speaker, author and early stage private equity investor. He is acknowledged as one of the most active angel investors in the country, having made and actively participated in over 87 technology investments during the past decade. He currently manages two angel VC funds (Berkus Technology Ventures, LLC and Kodiak Ventures, L.P.) Dave is past Chairman of the Tech Coast Angels, one of the largest angel networks in the United States. Dave is author of “Basic Berkonomics,” “Berkonomics,” “Advanced Berkonomics,” “Extending the Runway,” and the Small Business Success Collection. Find out more at Berkus.com or contact Dave at dberkus@berkus.com

Related Articles